Saving Your Marriage : Not As Difficult As It Seems

Submitted by: Tashie Stevens.

A good number of modern day marriages are ending up in divorce and if your marriage is also going down the drain, it is time to take some quick steps for saving your marriage.

A good number of modern day marriages are ending up in divorce and if your marriage is also going down the drain, it is time to take some quick steps for saving your marriage. Surviving divorce or saving marriage is one of the most difficult questions that modern couple faces. The answer to this complicated question lies in the hands of couple itself. You and your spouse have the power to either end up your marriage or make an effort to save it. Marriage problems crop up sooner or later in the life of every couple.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9MVBFq5fgE[/youtube]

However, it is greatly dependent on how the couple handles the situation so that saving your marriage could be possible. You might certainly be utterly confused and thinking that, isn?t it too late to save the marriage when you are already considering divorce as an option. In such a situation, it is wise to slow down and stop expecting quick result. Often people are conditioned to receive immediate results and think about marriage in the same way. Talk to your spouse while keeping the bitterness aside and try to sort out the problems with a cool head. It is certainly possible to derive a solution to your marital problems.

A whole hearted effort on your part can certainly contribute greatly in saving your marriage. Some of the commonest reasons of divorce are lack of communication between the couple, wrong expectations and lack of commitment as well. Marriage is no trade and you would surely experience various bumps in this tough terrain. However, a couple who really wants to save their marriage would talk to each other and try to ease out the situation. Marriage is a wonderful institution where you loved each other wholeheartedly and took the vows to love each other for your entire life. Of course, you would have seen a wonderful future with each other and that is why you decided to get married. But in case you are not happy with each other, relationship tips can be helpful in melting the ice between the two of you.

There are various reasons why people opt for divorce. Some of them include sex problems, cheating, money related problems, addiction and in numerous cases, petty things. Fighting over small things and trying to change each other?s habits can cause a gorge between the couple. In such a situation, it is wise to fix a relationship and get over the marital issues. If you are really keen about saving your marriage, do not stop communication. It is possible to solve every problem through communication. The couple must also get over the wrong expectations. The relationship problems can be resolved by understanding each other?s view point. Lessen your expectations and you would soon find your old love back. Surviving divorce is an extremely difficult job and therefore, it is certainly wise to work on your problems and get out of the pathetic situation. You can also take the service of marriage counselors for the purpose. It is worth a try.

About the Author: Tasha Stevenson is the author of this article on saving your marriage.Find more information on marriage problems here.Visit

relationships.somethingabout.com/articles/save-your-relationship/171-how-to-save-a-marriage-from-falling-apart

for more information.

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=1544403&ca=Relationships

Ontario Votes 2007: Interview with Communist Party candidate Shona Bracken, Toronto Danforth

Sunday, October 7, 2007

Shona Bracken is running for the Communist Party in the Ontario provincial election in Toronto—Danforth. Wikinews interviewed her regarding her values, her experience, and her campaign.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Ontario_Votes_2007:_Interview_with_Communist_Party_candidate_Shona_Bracken,_Toronto_Danforth&oldid=539050”

New Zealand prisoners do nothing says National party

Sunday, November 5, 2006

Figures released by Simon Power, law and order spokesman for the National party, show that the New Zealand Labour led government lets 81% of all prisoners not do any work while in prison. Newspaper, Sunday News says that some Christchurch prisoners have been given a barbecue for good behavior.

Simon Power’s figures show that of the 7,612 prisoners only 19% (1,470) of them took part in Corrections Inmate Employment during 2006. But in 2005 it was at 23% and in 2004 it was at 26%. He says that the prisons with the least amount of inmates working are: Rolleston with 8.6%, Mount Eden with 8.7%, Rimutaka with 11%, Christchurch Women’s with 13.5% and Dunedin with 13.8%. Mr Power said: “These figures are an appalling indictment on this Government’s approach to prisoner rehabilitation and preparing them for release.”

“In May, Corrections Minister Damien O’Connor announced a strategy that he said would help in ‘significantly increasing the number of prisoners in work and training. But a week later this was shown to be nothing more than window dressing when the Budget increased funding for prisoner employment by a measly $336,000 – up 1%.”

“They have cut funding [on the Corrections Department] by 27% since 2001/02, from $46.5 million to $34 million.”

Mr Power blames the low work rate on the big prison construction budget of $490 million. “There would have been more than a miserable $336,000 extra to spend on effective rehabilitation and work schemes,” he said.

“[Mr O’Conner] seems happier to spend $11 million on landscaping four new prisons and allow prisoners to sit around playing Playstations and Xboxes on their flat-screen TVs than he is about helping them get better prepared for when they are released.”

“Prisoners should be doing meaningful work, training or study while they are in prisons, and I imagine the public would agree,” Mr Power added.

Mr Power, commenting on the barbecue, said: “These people are in prison because they were found to be in serious breach of the law. The victims of their crimes will be grossly offended by the idea that they are being rewarded for anything. This is the just the latest in a long line of incredibly bad decisions made by the Corrections Department over the past year and taxpayers have had enough.”

Bevan Hanlon, president for the Corrections Officers Association, said: “The Mobsters getting a BBQ was a “joke”. (Christchurch Prison) staff are reporting the smell of dope every day. Mobsters are threatening staff on a daily basis and there appears to be high cellphone use (mobile phones are banned in jail). So what happens? They are given a BBQ.”

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=New_Zealand_prisoners_do_nothing_says_National_party&oldid=438705”

Italian goalkeeper Carlo Cudicini seriously injured in motorcycle accident

Friday, November 13, 2009

Italian goalkeeper Carlo Cudicini has been seriously injured in a motorcycle accident in London. The player, who plays for Tottenham Hotspurs, was involved in a collision with a car at 10:30 GMT. The football club reported that he has fractured his wrists and injured his pelvis.

A spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police released a statement saying “A 36-year-old male suffered injuries described by the London Ambulance Service as possibly life-changing and was taken to Whipps Cross Hospital for further assessment and treatment”. No arrests have been made.

Cudicini crashed his motorcycle into a Ford Fiesta with a female driver and a child passenger. Neither the driver or passenger were injured in the accident.

Cudicini is the son of former AC Milan goalkeeper Fabio Cudicini. During his career he has played for Lazio, AC Milan and Chelsea. He played for Chelsea for 10 years until he was transferred to Tottenham in January. He made one appearance for the Italian national team.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Italian_goalkeeper_Carlo_Cudicini_seriously_injured_in_motorcycle_accident&oldid=1241053”

How Not To Get Web Design Work

Submitted by: T. O’ Donnell

I get the occasional web design lead from my website. I wanted to find a company I could pass these onto. So I put an ad on a freelance site. It specified the programming qualifications needed, stated that the successful candidate should have good English, and was for companies only.

The replies I got were enlightening. So much so, I made a list of things applicants did wrong. Here it is.

I should point out I was initially prepared to give everyone a fair go. After the first twenty-odd emails, my attitude changed. I was looking for reasons to delete applicants. I only needed one successful one; with 100+ replies it was getting to be a headache, so I decided a brutal approach was needed.

1. Failed to read the spec.

Many applicants couldn’t write properly in the English language. Many were individuals only. Result: instant deletion.

2. Failed to address the spec’s criteria.

Applicants bragged about how great they were. Many copy-and-pasted standard marketing guff about ‘solutions’ and ‘partnerships’ into their emails.

To engage anyone’s interest about a proposal you need to talk less about yourself and more about the benefits to *them* of using you. One of the first things I learnt about applying for jobs is you need to show how you meet the criteria in the job description; see if you can find the employer’s wavelength.

3. Lots of jargon.

You quickly tune this out. Anyone dealing with web companies probably gets a lot of this. Applicants should talk to the client about *the client’s* site and *their* needs, and avoid techno-babble.

Write an application letter. Leave it for a while, then edit it. Brutally. Short punchy sentences, no guff. Talking convincingly about how you can make the client money would be an attention-getter.

4a. ‘Coming soon’ client-listing pages.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDmQ0rqdPsk[/youtube]

You say you’ve done work for lots of clients, then put up a ‘coming soon’ sign on the web page where your client list is supposed to be. Hmmmm.

4b. ‘Under construction’ pages on your company web site.

This looks bad; something you’d see on an amateur’s site. Another reason to bin your application.

4c. Only put up pictures of sites you’ve done, rather than links to the actual sites.

I’d have liked to see some working example sites. Pictures can be faked, and they don’t show background programming.

4e. No mention of your main web site URL.

Let us guess where your own site is (if you have one). It’s more fun! I tried guessing from the email address. After a while I didn’t bother.

4f. No hyperlinks at all.

Just a short email spiel saying “I am great designer, hire me”. Next!

5. Using Yahoo.com or Hotmail.com for your email address.

A pro designer shouldn’t use a freebie email address service. Basic web hosting costs $5 a month these days.

I can conceive that a web designer might use a freebie account for some special purpose, but your own domain name is a basic advert that goes out in each email you send.

6. Bad spelling and grammar.

Western civilisation is doomed, if using SMS jargon becomes the standard way to write to people. It doesn’t impress old frts lik me, fr strtrs 🙁 Especially if you’re looking for work where good spelling and grammar are important.

7. Front-loading Flash designs.

I admit it, I don’t like Flash. I especially don’t like it when it loads slowly on my broadband connection. I suppose it might impress an ignorant client, who doesn’t know the economic consequences of having a Flash-heavy site.

8. Don’t phone the employer up.

Unless they say ‘canvassing will disqualify’, ‘phoning the employer is a good idea. Why? Because geeks are famously introverted and tongue-tied, supposedly. So if a web site designer can communicate clearly over the telephone, that, coupled with a good application, puts you streets ahead of the email-only applicant.

No need to jabber. A polite enquiry to establish contact will do. “Just checking you’ve got my CV”, that sort of thing.

9. Keep yourself mysterious.

Emails are impersonal. Anything that can establish you as a human being, a person, a potential ally and friend, is good. It’ll make you more memorable. No need to jump out of a giant cake, ‘though!

However, you have to fulfil all the other criteria as well. However great a guy you are, if you’re a Unix man and they want Windows, forget it.

10. Leaving unclear phone messages.

One chap left a phone message, in which he mentioned his site, twice, but not his ‘phone number. His pronunciation was bad, so I guess I’ll never know how good he was.

11. Too far away.

Most replies were from India, Ukraine, Romania etc. Anyone who was closer to home (the UK) stood out. I mention it simply as a winnowing criterion.

Also, I needed someone who could land contracts from UK residents; good English, written and oral, was important.

12. Give your rates per hour.

Forget that. You’re not a lawyer. Web design jobs can be clearly defined, in terms of time, work and software required. A definite price can be agreed on in advance. It’s called a contract. Otherwise, you leave the client open to escalating bills, and yourself to mission-creep.

13. Delay applying.

The first few applications were more scrutinised. After that, fatigue set in. After one hundred, only an applicant who seems a real prospect would be given more than five seconds’ scrutiny.

About the Author: T. O’ Donnell (

tigertom.com

) is an ecommerce consultant and curmudgeon living in London, UK. His latest project is an ebook on conservatories, available at

ttconservatories.co.uk

. T. O’ Donnell freeware may be downloaded at

ttfreeware.co.uk

.

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=8335&ca=Internet

Canada’s Don Valley West (Ward 25) city council candidates speak

Friday, November 3, 2006

On November 13, Torontonians will be heading to the polls to vote for their ward’s councillor and for mayor. Among Toronto’s ridings is Don Valley West (Ward 25). Three candidates responded to Wikinews’ requests for an interview. This ward’s candidates include John Blair, Robertson Boyle, Tony Dickins, Cliff Jenkins (incumbent), and Peter Kapsalis.

For more information on the election, read Toronto municipal election, 2006.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Canada%27s_Don_Valley_West_(Ward_25)_city_council_candidates_speak&oldid=435105”

Iran’s morality police crack down on un-Islamic dress

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

The Iranian police forces have faced criticism from Ayatollah Hashemi Shahrudi, the head of the judiciary who was appointed by Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, for their re-invigorated campaign to do away with un-Islamic dress.

Ayatollah Shahroudi proclaimed, “Tough measures on social problems will backfire and have counter-productive effects.” Others have, of course, made it clear that un-Islamic dress can lead to moral corruption, engender innumerable vices, and hurt the Islamic character of the nation.

Some believe that no one had any issue with the creation of an Islamic atmosphere. The core of the matter revolves around the implementation of the Islamic dress code; additionally, heavy-handed measures should be shunned. For instance, Mehdi Ahmadi, information head of Tehran’s police, told Al Jazeera: “Some citizens may complain about the way the law is being enforced but they all agree with the plan itself.”

According to one student, “You simply can’t tell people what to wear. They don’t understand that use of force only brings hatred towards them, not love.” Nevertheless, Hojatoll-Islam Mostafa Pour-Mohammadi, Iran’s interior minister who is in charge of policing, prognosticated positive feedback from the populace when he said, “People are unhappy with the social and moral status of the society. They expect that the fight against social insecurity be properly implemented.” Thus, Hujjat al-Islam Pour-Mohammadi re-iterated the necessity of proper implementation and methodology towards the restoration of morality in the Islamic Republic. Islamic officials and religious people affirm that this is indispensable to promote righteousness, curb sin, and bring open sinners to justice.

Following the Islamic Revolution in 1979, hijab became mandatory in Iran for every woman including foreigners after over 98% of citizens voted for an Islamic government. Women may face caning up to 74 strokes for failing to observe hijab. In this recent crackdown, the authorities have arrested many citizens throughout the country. Not only have women been taken into custody for their hair being uncovered on their foreheads and tight clothes that show body shapes, For men they need to cover from knee to their waist as according to Sharia. Even a foreign journalist was detained because the photograph on her press card was indecent.

It has not been clear whence the directive for the re-newed clampdown emanated. Some have blamed Mahmoud Ahmadinejad while Gholam Hossein Elham, the government spokesman, stated to reporters, “The police work as agents of the judiciary to confront crimes. The government as an executive body does not interfere in the affairs of the judiciary.” The following pre-election speech seems to corroborate this latter statement:

In reality, is the problem of our people the shape of the hair of our children? Let our children arrange their hair any way they wish. It doesn’t concern me and you. Let you and me overhaul the basic problems of the nation. The government should fix the economy of the nation and improve its atmosphere…[It should] better psychological security and support the people. People have variegated tastes. As if now the arch obstacle of our nation is the arrangement of our kids’ hair and the government disallowing them <He chuckles>. Is this the government’s responsibility? Is this the people’s merit? In actuality, this is the denigration of our people. Why do you underestimate and belittle the people? It is the real issue of our nation that one of our daughters donned a certain dress? Is this the issue of our nation and the problem of our nation?
Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Iran%27s_morality_police_crack_down_on_un-Islamic_dress&oldid=4558895”

Nigerian troops allegedly burned down slums after soldier’s killing

Friday, August 25, 2006

Residents in the city of Port Harcourt said that Nigerian troops burnt down hundreds of slum dwellings, allegedly as reprisal after an Army sergeant was killed in Thursday’s abduction of oil workers in the area.

Residents told news agencies that troops poured petrol over slum houses located near a compound belonging to Saipem, a subsidiary of Italian oil company Eni, and set them alight. The fires have reportedly destroyed hundreds of homes and shops and hundreds of people are said to have fled from the area. On Friday, people returning to the area and onlookers were chased away by soldiers.

Speaking to the Associated Press, Army Brigadier General Samuel Salihu denied that Nigerian troops were responsible for the arson. He said that militants active in the area had set the fires, wearing Army camouflage.

On Thursday, oil workers were kidnapped from a bar near the slums by armed men who shot dead an Army soldier guarding the workers, and injured another soldier. Nigerian military sources said at least two foreign oil workers were missing, one of them, Italian. The Italian foreign ministry, though, said that three foreigners were missing.

The oil-rich Niger Delta region has witnessed a spate of kidnappings recently. Nineteen people were held captive in eight separate abductions this month. All but three of them have been released since, some after the state government and the oil companies paid a ransom.

The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND), a militant group which has taken hostages and attacked oil facilities, but says it does not kidnap for ransom, said in a statement that it the state government has encouraged such abductions by paying ransoms.

Last week, as part of a tougher line adopted by the Nigerian government, President Obasanjo sent in the Army, with orders to use “force for force” against militants in the region. Over 160 people were taken into custody in a two day crackdown, including over 100 from a nearby slum, but most have been released since then.

The BBC’s Alex Last reports that local leaders and oil companies are concerned that this new tough policy will increase tensions in the region.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Nigerian_troops_allegedly_burned_down_slums_after_soldier%27s_killing&oldid=3130429”

Why You Should Get A Doctorate Degree In Criminal Justice

By Kenneth Echie

Getting a doctorate degree qualifies you for a special club. It is the club of people that are considered an Authority is their chosen field of study. Not everybody can qualify for this club. It takes considerable study and dedication to earn the right of passage to this special club. And make no mistake about it, the gatekeepers of this club do not hand the keys to the entrance very easily.

But why would anybody put themselves through the torture of such rigorous study? Is it worth it? Are there benefits to be gained after one acquires the right of passage. In this article, I cover why you should get a doctorate degree in criminal justice.

1. Getting a doctorate degree in criminal justice almost assures you of employment when you graduate. How many PhD holders do you know that are not employed? If you know many, I submit to you that they probably went to diploma mill school where doctorate degrees are handed to people with the money to get one.

Because reputable doctorate programs subject their students to rigorous study, graduates are held in high regard. In fact, most PhD students start working by teaching as teaching assistants while getting their degree. This teaching experience gives you the relevant experience to get employment as soon as you graduate. If you are not given employment by your current school, there are other schools or organizations that will be there to snap you up as soon as you complete your program.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRURSHMH1QM[/youtube]

2. As I said above, a doctorate degree makes you an authority in your chosen field of study. So a doctorate degree in criminal justice will make you an authority in the criminal justice field. Your opinion and expertise will be sought in matters related to criminal justice.

You should be prepared to be called to testify in court cases. You may also be called to offer your expertise in legislative issues relating to criminal justice. And if you are really good and possess good communication skills, media such as television and newspapers may interview you for criminal justice news stories.

You can use the media exposure to set yourself up for consulting opportunities. As a consultant, you get to charge people for your services.

3. Another reason to get a doctorate degree in criminal justice is the pay. People with a PhD degree make an average salary of $77,000 per year compared to people with masters degree that make an average of$61,000 per year. This is a whopping $18,000 more per year.

You can also make extra income on the side. Working for a company or organization does not stop you from being a consultant and making money on the side. It is difficult for any organization you work for to stop you when your expertise is sought. This is especially true when it comes to criminal justice issues that could be of benefit to society.

The above are just a few of the whys and reasons you should consider getting a doctorate degree in criminal justice. There are definitely more. But it is hard to cover all of them in such a short article as this. I advise you to look further if you are still wondering why you should get a doctorate degree in criminal justice. There are websites on the internet that cover them in more detail. You should visit them for more information.

Note: You are free to reprint or republish this article. The only condition is that the Resource Box should be included and the links are live links.

About the Author: Copywrite Kenneth Echie. Kenneth is a writer for Criminal Justice Degrees . Get free scholarship and grant report and find Online Criminal Justice Doctorate Degrees by visiting. Affiliated website: Extra Income Ideas http://www.continuingeducation4u.info

Source: isnare.com

Permanent Link: isnare.com/?aid=219749&ca=Education

Arizona bans abortion for genetic abnormalities

Friday, April 30, 2021

On Tuesday, the Governor of the US state of Arizona Doug Ducey signed into law a bill banning abortion if sought solely because of a foetus’ genetic abnormality.

Senate Bill 1457, which stalled twice for criticism by opponents of abortion, passed both chambers of the Republican-controlled Arizona Legislature last week in a party-line vote, amended twice along the way to alleviate concerns by two hesitant Republicans.

The bill makes it a Class 6 felony, the least severe, to seek or perform an abortion “because of a genetic abnormality of the child”, defined as “the presence or presumed presence of an abnormal gene expression in an unborn child”, but not a “severe fetal abnormality” considered “incompatible with life.” Intimidating someone to get an abortion and soliciting or accepting monies to finance an abortion for this purpose has been made a Class 3 felony.

The bill also allows the unborn child’s father or, in case the mother is under 18, a maternal grandparent to sue, as well as including the applicability of state law to “an unborn child at every stage of development”, which Senator Kirsten Engel and Representative Melody Hernandez wrote in a submitted minority report “would open up the potential for prosecutors to charge persons including the pregnant individual whose conduct results in a woman having a miscarriage with murder, manslaughter or child endangerment.”

Other provisions of the bill includes a prohibition on the distribution “via courier, delivery or mail service” of abortion-inducing drugs, a ban on any public educational institution from performing or aiding non-life saving abortion, a ban on the use of public or tax monies paid by the state or students for university research involving foetal remains or somatic cell nuclear transfer, or any state money towards organisations providing abortion care, and requiring all foetal remains to be buried or cremated.

KYMA-DT reported Ducey is an anti-abortion rights governor who ran on the Republican ballot and has never vetoed anti-abortion legislation. In a statement, Duckey said, “[t]here’s immeasurable value in every single life — regardless of genetic makeup […] We will continue to prioritize protecting life in our preborn children, and this legislation goes a long way in protecting real human lives.” The news release, originally published on his website also read, “[w]ith this legislation, Arizona remains among the top pro-life states in the nation.”

Senator Nancy Barto said, according to the release “[w]e need to protect our most vulnerable, especially those with treatable genetic conditions […] They are loved, integral members of our community that make Arizona whole”. Cathi Herrod, president of Center for Arizona Policy said in her own news release, according to the Associated Press “[t]oday, Arizonans win.”

Representative Diego Espinoza wrote in a tweet, “I’m disappointed to see Arizona moving in this direction, ignoring the needs and desires of doctors, women, and families for an extreme political agenda.” Representative and House Democratic Leader Reginald Bolding wrote in a statement “it’s disturbing and wrong that the legislature is not focusing on policies to help [women], and instead is stripping away the fundamental freedom to choose if, when, and how to start or grow a family.”

In a letter shared to a Facebook post, the union United Campus Workers at Arizona State University urged last Saturday to the Arizona Board of Regents, university president Michael M. Crow and University of Arizona president Robert D. Robbins to “immediately speak out against SB 1457”, calling it “a blatant attack on reproductive freedom”.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Arizona_bans_abortion_for_genetic_abnormalities&oldid=4626399”